Tuesday, May 29, 2018
William Bauer MD Otolaryngologist and OWCP hearing loss cases
If OWCP denied your hearing loss claim based upon a report by ENT William Bauer MD, please give me a call as the denial may have nothing to do with whether or not you actually have noise related hearing loss, it would appear that this physician specializes in writing reports that are calculated to get your claim denied. Just as a broken clock will be correct twice a day, it might be that you don't have noise related hearing loss, but in my client's circumstances this doctor's opinion had nothing to do with the merits of the case and appeared to only relate solely to a desire to get OWCP to send more business by writing unfavorable reports. If your hearing loss claim was denied based upon a report by William Bauer MD don't give up!
Monday, May 14, 2018
Postal Worker Loses $37K in SSDI Benefits for Failure to Advise of OWCP workers comp payments
There are offsets between your federal workers comp benefits paid by OWCP and benefits you receive from SSA. When you are receiving monetary benefits from OWCP and you receive disability benefits from SSA, you must notify SSA, as there may be a reduction of your SSD benefit and if you don't stay on top of this you will ultimately have a significant overpayment that you are required to repay. Similarly, an OWCP recipient who is in the FERS retirement system and begins receiving SSA retirement benefits must notify OWCP immediately of this as there is an offset that runs the other way; OWCP gets a credit for the portion of your SSA retirement annuity that arises from your federal employment. Just because you tell OWCP that you have started receiving the SSA retirement does not mean you are ok, you need to follow up and make sure your claims examiner has requested the necessary information from SSA. If OWCP fails to follow up, you will still have an overpayment and likely be required to repay it.
Here is a link to a story about a USPS employee who received an overpayment from SSA due to failing to notify SSA of receipt of OWCP benefits:
https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/workers-compensation/b/recent-cases-news-trends-developments/archive/2018/05/11/united-states-postal-worker-loses-37k-in-ssdi-benefits-for-failure-to-advise-of-workers-comp-awards.aspx
Here is a link to a story about a USPS employee who received an overpayment from SSA due to failing to notify SSA of receipt of OWCP benefits:
https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/workers-compensation/b/recent-cases-news-trends-developments/archive/2018/05/11/united-states-postal-worker-loses-37k-in-ssdi-benefits-for-failure-to-advise-of-workers-comp-awards.aspx
Monday, April 30, 2018
OWCP Launches Initiative To Assist With Claims Arising From The September 11th Terrorist Attacks
In a recent "news" item, OWCP announced a new initiative to assist federal employees with FECA claims arising from the September 11th Terrorist Attacks. Information about this can be found on the OWCP website at:
https://www.dol.gov/owcp/dfec/FECAClaimsSeptember11.htm
However, the biggest issue with these cases, which is NOT addressed in the announcement and guidance offered by OWCP, is the severe and unreasonable approach taken by OWCP in approaching timeliness. The biggest obstacle to 9/11 claims at this point in time is making sure that a claim is explained in a manner that does not allow OWCP to deny the claim on the basis that allows OWCP to unreasonably determine that the claimant should have known they had an injury and missed their time limitation for filing the claim within three years of when they knew or should have known of their injury.
If you are contemplating filing a claim for a medical condition arising from 9/11, or your presence at Ground Zero, or work related to that event, please realize that you must either explain that you have still been exposed to work factors contributing to your condition within three years of the date of filing your claim, or you must have a medical condition that was "latent" meaning it did not arise until more recently (such as cancer) and you must file your claim within three years of when you knew or should have known that your condition arose from that exposure. You can also show that you gave your supervisor written notice of your injury at the time the injury occurred.
This can be particularly complex in a claim for PTSD or other mental health condition arising from exposure. There are many cases in which OWCP essentially says, you should have known you have PTSD if you were there and if you file your claim more than three years after that exposure they will deny your claim on timeliness. There are sometimes ways to work around this issue, but it is critical that if you are filing a claim now, for a condition that you relate to exposure that occurred more than three years ago, you stand a very good chance of getting a denial unless your claim can be explained in a way that allows you to meet the three year time limitation.
https://www.dol.gov/owcp/dfec/FECAClaimsSeptember11.htm
However, the biggest issue with these cases, which is NOT addressed in the announcement and guidance offered by OWCP, is the severe and unreasonable approach taken by OWCP in approaching timeliness. The biggest obstacle to 9/11 claims at this point in time is making sure that a claim is explained in a manner that does not allow OWCP to deny the claim on the basis that allows OWCP to unreasonably determine that the claimant should have known they had an injury and missed their time limitation for filing the claim within three years of when they knew or should have known of their injury.
If you are contemplating filing a claim for a medical condition arising from 9/11, or your presence at Ground Zero, or work related to that event, please realize that you must either explain that you have still been exposed to work factors contributing to your condition within three years of the date of filing your claim, or you must have a medical condition that was "latent" meaning it did not arise until more recently (such as cancer) and you must file your claim within three years of when you knew or should have known that your condition arose from that exposure. You can also show that you gave your supervisor written notice of your injury at the time the injury occurred.
This can be particularly complex in a claim for PTSD or other mental health condition arising from exposure. There are many cases in which OWCP essentially says, you should have known you have PTSD if you were there and if you file your claim more than three years after that exposure they will deny your claim on timeliness. There are sometimes ways to work around this issue, but it is critical that if you are filing a claim now, for a condition that you relate to exposure that occurred more than three years ago, you stand a very good chance of getting a denial unless your claim can be explained in a way that allows you to meet the three year time limitation.
Friday, January 5, 2018
OWCP Periodic Roll payment schedule 2018
OWCP's 2018 payment schedule is now accessible on the web. It can become confusing to understand what date the next payment is due from OWCP as they issue payments on a 28 day cycle, 13 times a year. Here is a link to the 2018 payment schedule:
https://www.dol.gov/owcp/dfec/regs/compliance/Periodic-Roll-Payment-Schedule.htm
https://www.dol.gov/owcp/dfec/regs/compliance/Periodic-Roll-Payment-Schedule.htm
Friday, December 8, 2017
OWCP's medical bill processing web portal - new address effective December 31, 2017
Effective December 31, 2017, the web address for OWCP’s
medical bill processor (currently Conduent) will change. The web address “https://owcp.dol.acs-inc.com” will no
longer be valid for access to the Web Bill Processing Portal.
The new
web address is https://owcpmed.dol.gov
Tuesday, November 7, 2017
Arnold Berman - Did OWCP decide your schedule award based upon a report from this doctor? If so, there seems to be a good chance he got it wrong.
When you suffer a permanent injury to a body part, you are often due a schedule award for that permanent condition. Your impairment rating should be for all of the conditions impairing the rated body part, not just the accepted condition. OWCP sends files to doctors to review the schedule award requests. They call those doctors District Medical Advisors (DMA). A DMA reviews your file and writes a memo advising OWCP whether or not your rating was done correctly and your schedule award is processed based upon those memos. Unfortunately, Arnold Berman has continued to make basic errors in his reports regarding concepts that are so well established that OWCP ran a special training program this past May and required all of the DMAs to attend so that they would not continue to make the same types of basic errors over and over. It is unclear why, even after that training, Arnold Berman continues to make such errors that result in a lower rating than what someone is entitled to receive. OWCP has recognized in this most recent case that Arnold Berman failed
to follow the basic concepts applicable to the case and arranged for some sort of remedial training so that this hopefully does not continue to occur.
If your schedule award is based upon a DMA memo by Anold Berman, there is a good chance he rated you lower than what you should have been rated.
If your schedule award is based upon a DMA memo by Anold Berman, there is a good chance he rated you lower than what you should have been rated.
Thursday, October 5, 2017
Why did OWCP send me a letter telling me to meet with a Quality Assurance Specialist ("QAS")
I recently heard of a claimant whose benefits are handled by the Cleveland OWCP office who received a letter demanding that the claimant travel 4.5 hours to meet with an individual who was identified
as a Quality Assurance Specialist (QAS). This time the letter did not provide the name of the person the claimant was to meet with. The last time I saw a letter like this, the person identified as the QAS was actually a criminal investigator from USDOL.
Its not clear whether the persons receiving these letters are being specifically targeted or perhaps this is just the usual routine over the top OWCP bullying techniques.
When OWCP sends you a letter telling you to do something, if there is an explicit threat that if you don't cooperate your benefits will be sanctioned, then you cannot ignore the letter. However, if the letter does not give you notice that there is a penalty for not responding, then you may want to consider whether or not you respond.
The fact that the person acting as a "QAS" in the previous such communication I reviewed regarding this was in reality a criminal investigator, makes me concerned that if you receive a letter like this, you may want to have a lawyer handle your communications regarding the request that you meet with the "QAS" person.
Its not clear whether the persons receiving these letters are being specifically targeted or perhaps this is just the usual routine over the top OWCP bullying techniques.
When OWCP sends you a letter telling you to do something, if there is an explicit threat that if you don't cooperate your benefits will be sanctioned, then you cannot ignore the letter. However, if the letter does not give you notice that there is a penalty for not responding, then you may want to consider whether or not you respond.
The fact that the person acting as a "QAS" in the previous such communication I reviewed regarding this was in reality a criminal investigator, makes me concerned that if you receive a letter like this, you may want to have a lawyer handle your communications regarding the request that you meet with the "QAS" person.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
