Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Get SSA to "pay" attorney fees arising from your OWCP claim
http:/policy.ssa.gov/poms.nsf/links/0452150050
Saturday, April 9, 2011
Facebook and Other Social Media
Friday, April 1, 2011
Time Limitations Do Not Always Apply
The time limitation to file a claim for an occupational exposure such as hearing loss and asbestosis is three years from when you were last exposed to the work factor or three years from when you knew or should have known of the illness, whichever is later. “Notice” is the key word. If your employer conducted screenings for asbestos exposure or hearing loss, those records in your personnel file can sometimes be used many years later, when your claim is seemingly far out of time, to establish “notice” of your claim to your employer.
Another area where time limitations may not apply is with schedule awards. So long as your claim has not been terminated, you should be able to claim a schedule award or an increase in a schedule award. The critical time limitation is that you must be alive to claim it. That means the CA-7 requesting the schedule award and sufficient medical evidence to establish your rating must be in the workers compensation file while you are alive.
Even when someone has received an unfavorable decision in a FECA case from OWCP and they have missed the one year for requesting further review, there are limited circumstances where a Reconsideration can successfully be pursued. However, the standard of proof is much more difficult, described by OWCP as “clear evidence of error.” Generally, new medical evidence will not get you over this hurdle. In my experience, one must usually point to an error by OWCP to meet this standard.
A claim for compensation for lost wages in an accepted case may be claimed well after the fact as may an election of benefits if you are in receipt of an OPM annuity. Claims for consequential injuries and recurrence of disability do not have a firm deadline for submission either.
A request to modify a Loss of Wage Earning Capacity determination can also be submitted at any time. This is especially relevant presently for many USPS workers who are being put out of work due to the NRP who were previously given erroneous LWEC determinations.
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Computer Problems Delay 3/1/11 COLA for FECA Recipients
I have spoken with several knowledgeable persons who confirm that some sort of computer glitch has delayed implementation of the 1.7% COLA. The next periodic roll payments should reflect the COLA; OWCP will send FECA recipients a separate supplemental check to cover the COLA adjustment effective March 1, 2011 or they may include it in the next periodic payment.
At least one claimant who called District 2 (NY) was told that there will not be a COLA adjustment this year which I am advised is incorrect. Unfortunately, FECA claimants will actually see their net check go down once again in 2011 as the cost of health insurance continues to increase far more rapidly than the COLA on their wage loss and schedule award payments.
Beware Bad Advice About A Schedule Award
I met with a gentleman the other day who has spoken to me on numerous occasions over the last decade regarding his long-standing workers compensation case. This time he was poking around on the internet and stumbled on the website of a lawyer who apparently only wants to focus on getting FECA claimants schedule awards from OWCP. The website brags about how much this lawyer can get injured workers for schedule awards. A link pops up inviting you to speak with the lawyer. Next thing he knew, they were discussing his case on the phone. This lawyer starts explaining how he can get him a schedule award, and that he should be entitled to a lot of money.
Now this gentleman has had a hard life and, fortunately, has learned to think twice about things. We sat down and talked about the case and the various pluses and minuses of the situation. Sure, he could pursue a schedule award. But a schedule award is most valuable to someone who is back to work earning a salary or to someone receiving a pension under CSRS. This gentleman is not eligible for a pension and cannot work which means that his schedule award must be collected INSTEAD of his wage loss check. So all he would get is a slightly larger check temporarily, probably less than a year in this case. Much of the gain would end up in the pocket of the internet lawyer. AND, the danger is that when you poke OWCP, you never know where it might lead.
I advised the gentleman that I would not open anything up with OWCP on a case like this without first making sure that his current entitlement is rock solid. A small net schedule award payment is not worth the risk that his check could be significantly reduced for the rest of his life, or maybe even cut off, as a result of a new round of directed medical examinations with OWCP-selected physicians. Pursuing a schedule award without considering the repercussions is reckless. I was not surprised that I had NEVER seen the internet lawyer’s name on an ECAB decision, which indicates that he does not have much experience handling these cases.
Be careful, there are a lot of predators out there, and not just OWCP.
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Benefits for Same-Sex Married Couples Under FECA
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/February/11-ag-222.html
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Q&As about FECA benefits
Here is a link: http://www.neguard.com/HRO/documents/ca-550.pdf
